Best Practices for Maintaining Galaxy Workflows

There are a number of things the user interface of Galaxy will allow that are not considered best practices because they make the workflow harder to test, use within subworkflows and invocation reports, and consume via the API. It is easier to use workflows in all of these contexts if they stick to the best practices discussed in this document.

Many of these best practices can be checked with Planemo using the follow command:

$ planemo workflow_lint path/to/workflow.ga

If workflow_lint is sent a directory, it will scan the directory for workflow artifacts - including Galaxy workflows and Dockstore .dockstore.yml files that register Galaxy workflows.

Workflow Structure

Outputs

Workflows should define explicit, labelled outputs. Galaxy doesn’t require you to declare outputs explicitly or label them - but doing so provides a lot of advantages. A workflow with declared, labelled outputs specifies an explicit interface that is much easier to consume when building a report for the workflow, testing the workflow, using the workflow via the API, and using the workflow as a subworkflow in Galaxy.

Screenshot of using workflow outputs in Galaxy workflow editor

The above screenshot demonstrates a MultiQC node with its stats output marked as an output and labelled as qc_stats.

Note

The Galaxy workflow editor will help you ensure that workflow output labels are unique across a workflow. Also be sure to add labels to your outputs before using a workflow as a subworkflow in another workflow so less stable and less contextualized step indicies and tool output names don’t need to be used.

Inputs

Similarly to outputs and for similar reasons, all inputs should be explicit (with labelled input nodes) and tool steps should not have disconnected data inputs (even though the GUI can handle this) or consume workflow parameters. Older style “runtime parameters” should only be used for post job actions and newer type workflow parameter inputs should be used to manipulate tool logic.

Screenshot of using workflow inputs in Galaxy workflow editor

A full tutorial on building Galaxy workflows with newer explicit workflow parameters can be found as part of the Galaxy Training Network.

In addition to making the interface easier to use in the context of subworkflows, the API, testing, etc.. future enhancements to Galaxy will allow a much simpler UI for workflows that only use explicit input parameters in this fashion.

https://github.com/galaxyproject/galaxy/pull/9151

Tools

The tools used within a workflow should be packaged with Galaxy by default or published to the main Galaxy ToolShed. Using private tool sheds or the test tool shed limits the ability of other Galaxy’s to use the workflow.

Syntax

Planemo workflow_lint also checks if workflows have the correct JSON or YAML syntax. This may be less of a problem for workflows exported from a Galaxy instance but can assist with workflows hand-edited or implemented using the newer YAML gxformat2 syntax.

Tests

Writing workflow tests allows consumers of your workflow to know it works in their Galaxy environment and can allow for richer continuous integration (CI). Check out the Planemo Test Format documentation for more information on the format and how to test workflows with Planemo.

Planemo can help you stud out tests for a workflow developed within the UI quickly with the workflow_test_init command.

$ planemo workflow_test_init path/to/workflow.ga

This command creates a template test file, with inputs, parameters and expected outputs left blank for you to fill in. If you’ve already run the workflow on an external Galaxy server, you can generate a more complete test file directly from the invocation ID using the --from_invocation option.

$ planemo workflow_test_init --from_invocation <INVOCATION ID> --galaxy_url <GALAXY SERVER URL> --galaxy_user_key" <GALAXY API KEY>

You also need to specify the server URL and your API key, as Galaxy invocation IDs are only unique to a particular server. You can obtain the invocation ID from <GALAXY SERVER URL>/workflows/invocations.

Publishing

Unlike with Galaxy tools - the Galaxy team doesn’t endorse a specific registry for Galaxy workflows. But also unlike Galaxy tools, any user can just paste a URL for a workflow right into the user interface so sharing a workflow can be as easy as passing around a GitHub link.

Github

Even if you’re publishing your workflows to other registries or website, we always recommend publishing workflows to Github (or a publicly available Gitlab server).

Dockstore

A repository containing Galaxy workflows and published to GitHub can be registered with Dockstore. This allows others to search for the workflow and access it using standard GA4GH APIs. In the future, deep bi-directional integration between Galaxy and Dockstore will be available that will make these workflows even more useful.

A .dockstore.yml file should be placed in the root of your workflow repository before registering the repository with Dockstore. This will allow Dockstore to find your workflows and their tests automatically.

Planemo can create this file for you by executing the dockstore_init command from the root of your workflow repository

$ planemo dockstore_init

Planemo’s workflow_lint will check the contents of your .dockstore.yml file during execution if this file is present.

Workflow Hub

Information on uploading workflows to workflowhub.eu can be found here.